Owl's Head Light

Owl's Head Light
Owl's Head Maine

Monday, September 17, 2012

The Gospel of John Lesson 1 (9-15-2012)


The Gospel of John
Lesson 1 – John 1:1-5
V. 1-3
As we come to the Book of John we see that John begins his argument or declaration for the faith with some bold statements. It is as if by making such bold statements right from the beginning he is saying to us that if you continue past this point with him, listening to him that you may have a chance to understand and believe.
He begins by taking us back to very beginning. Not the beginning of his story. Not the beginning of his encounter or experience as you might expect. And, not even to the beginning of history. But, he takes us back to the beginning of all things. Wow! What a bold statement. His first sentence! As John begins it is clear that John is not making his argument toward the Jews, for if he was he would have lost most if not all of them right here because of the way he presents God to us in this first verse.
You will notice that in Mathew’s Gospel that Matthew opens his argument focused toward the Jews with a beginning statement as to the genealogical origin of Jesus. But, not John. Remember, John is writing his account some 40 years later than Matthew’s account and some 20 to 30 years after the rest of the New Testament had been written. John is a late comer. He had probably seen or at least heard of most of the Biblical documents in circulation. This in all likely hood influenced John’s writing. But, probably the biggest influence in John’s writing was experience. He had lived a lifetime of years well seasoned with experience in the faith and memories of his encounters with Christ.
John is writing to the world and he plainly begins not with a connection to any one nation or to the beginning of mankind on the earth, but to the beginning of everything. The Holy Spirit knowing the possible arguments that we or any future generation of mankind might throw up in defense of our argument moved John to confront us right here. This very first sentence is John’s statement and premise on which he wants us to believe. The rest of this Gospel is his proof offered to us that his premise is true.
He begins by stating the clear truth as to what he is saying and where he is going with his account. It is right here where many including almost all cult followings depart going another direction. For in believing John’s beginning premise it is hard to argue against the rest of his message. For if we agree, or even give way to the possibility that his premise might be so then we might take the time to listen to his argument in the end deciding also what we believe.
But, for those who have already made up their mind not to believe they either have to avoid this truth that is here in the beginning of John or they have to alter this verse from its original text as some have tried to do. He begins with a truth that is hard to get past if you are not looking for the truth. Nicodemus, a Pharisee, a religious leader, is one who came looking for the truth. We will see his initial encounter with Christ in chapter 3. But, most of the Pharisees would deny this Gospel holding onto their manmade religion trying to justify their ritual and their way. It is hard to find the truth if you are not looking for it.
As we come to this first verse in John it is good to begin with a question, for the rest of the book unfolds from this initial point. What is his statement in this first sentence/verse? What is he actually saying? He begins by using an interesting term that most Bible commentators find it hard to define as to what John is actually referring to. But, moved by the Holy Spirit, John uses one word interestingly enough to name the Being that he is going to tell us about. (God)
John did not come up with this Name by himself. It was God who moved John to use the word ‘Word’ to name Himself. In beginning this book, it is like the word ‘Word’ coming out of eternity past standing by itself as the full declaration of God and who this God is. Imagine that! One word containing the ‘full’ representation’ of God. In one word God declares Himself and in one word God represents Himself. If you think about it, it is not unlike the fullness of God being found in one man. Read Col. 1:19 Think of it. How can the fullness of God possibly be squeezed into one man??Again, think of it. The full expression of God found in one ‘Word’.
It is also no different than the name God chose for Himself when He called Himself by the name ‘I AM’. In that case He used two words just about saying it all. John, in actuality God, used words to convey to us Who God is. If you think of it using the one word ‘Word’ is definitive,…and yet this one word is infinite. It is not being restrictive, and yet, it is all inclusive of any group of words used to describe who God is.
Having the name or expression for God as ‘Word’ allows us to experience God for Who He is in any direction, precept or principle that applies to Him. Using other additional words to convey God to us would restrict the Fullness of God to one or several attributes or concepts concerning God not relaying to us all the other attributes that make God God. He used the one word ‘Word’ as an all inclusive descriptive term similar to the vastness of expression and meaning in the term ‘I AM’.
A good example of this in a secular arena of what I am saying might be the use of the term ‘computer’. By stating the term or one ‘word’ computer you can go in any direction on this topic describing aspects or attributes of computers on any level or tangent that is pertinent taking us down paths of discussion or thought or revelation that can be seemingly endless.  John using this one Word puts God in focus for us beginning our journey. In this case less said truly is more, think of it!
In Jn. 1:1-2 he uses the two first verses to pin down for us exactly Who he is referring to as he begins his account. Again right here is where many veer off heading in another direction unable to at least consider John’s beginning statement. It is here where many will leave and go somewhere else looking to find some justification for their beliefs not wanting to accept or consider John’s statement.
Some will even try to change what John is saying making it try to align with their beliefs. But, John in these first two verses makes it clear to us exactly Who he is talking about, putting his expression of God before us in such a way that we can begin to behold Him!
In verse one he says three things about God. First he gives us a reference point taking us back to a specific point. As you read the first two verses, however, you will get the impression that John is actually taking us back to this point because it is as far back as we can go in our understanding of God. Past that point is hard for us to conceive. But, John in reality brings us back to this point and asks us by his further declarations to stand here on this reference point and ‘look back over the edge’ so to speak, and look ‘into the ‘deep’, …seeing a vast chasm larger than the vast expanse of the universe.
After taking us back to the beginning of all things, he tags the One he is referring to as ‘the Word’ to the one word we associate with being responsible for all things…God or I AM. He tells us that this Word he is referring to not only knew about God, but in actuality knew Him. In stating it the way that John does he intimately connects this ‘Word’ with God personally in a relationship very closely associated like a family relationship, saying in essence that ‘the Word’ and God knew each other intimately.
He continues in the last part of this verse making a third declaration concerning the One he is talking about. In this third declaration he comes right out and makes the statement that this Word is in actually God raising the bar of expectation of proof as John shares his encounter with us concerning Christ.
Some would pose the question here ‘Why did John take three steps to get to his final point or declaration?’ How John begins his Gospel is important from another perspective. In beginning his Gospel this way he also makes a fourth declaration to us, a bonus declaration so to speak. He makes a strong statement concerning this God expressing Himself in the Trinity having three distinct Personalities, yet being One God. This is a theme that we will see throughout John’s Gospel as well as the other Gospels. In stating the first two verses to us in this way he, John, makes the point that this Word that he is talking about is separate and distinct in personality and yet at the same time is complete and full being the One true God, a mystery too hard for man to wrap his mind around.
This is a testimony to me that John is giving us the full story here in his account. The concept of the trinity for a Jew is a hard concept to embrace and yet you will see John refer to the different Persons of the Trinity many times in his gospel. To me this is proof that he is not just highlighting and embracing those things that he can identify with, putting his spin on things.
Yet, as we will see, John as well as the other writers of the Scriptures will encourage us to embrace the entire fullness of God through faith. Here in these first two verses John expresses to us the complete fullness of God using words or ‘the Word’ to reveal Him to us. As we will see John will continue to use words to take us further in our understanding of the One he walked with.
V. 3-5
When you get close to someone you get to know them pretty good and as you get to know them better you either lose faith in them and what they stand for or you stand up for who they say they are or for what they are known for. Even if you know them well and support them or believe in their cause, you still get to know their shortcomings and weaknesses sometimes overlooking them, but not denying that they have them. However, it seems that John as he got closer to Jesus he saw that there was much more to this man than even he saw at first.
He continues in the next few verses broadening the foundation of understanding about the One he is referring to. He makes another bold statement here in v. 3. He states that ‘everything’ that we see and know and also what we don’t know that is were made by Him, the Word. This would include things on the earth as well as in the heavens. But, this would also include things unseen or not known to us. In the last part of the first chapter of the book of Ephesians in v. 21 Paul refers to principalities, powers and dominions suggesting to us that there are places and things that are real that we do not see as humans nor is in our realm of experience. We do not perceive them. Here in v. 3 John gives this Word he is talking about credit for creating and making even those places Paul is referring to in Ephesians by making the statement that all things were made by Him and goes further making it clear that there was nothing made that was not made by Him.
In v. 4 he shares another aspect of His part in creation. Here in v. 4 he credits the One he is talking about with the essence of the magic of ‘Life’.  In our realm of experience in life here on earth there are two major groups of things that are known to us as humans, material non living and material living. For some reason if we were just make the claim of a man putting together non living matter we might give some credence to the possibility of the thought of that being possible for man has proved himself here. But, to the creating of life, that is something else.
Man having the ability to take different material things and to craft, tool or chemically alter them to produce something complex and much different to the original components comes into the possibility of mans acceptance. But, giving life to those things is a whole different animal. The giving of life is only credited with God or divinity, and here John gives this Word who walked on earth as a man the credit for all life. We will soon see that he is referring to Christ here in this verse (v. 14). He refers to this life as the Light of men, the light that turns on the body at birth and turns off the same at death.
However, in v. 5 he uses another descriptive term that he attributes to the Word that he talked about in v. 1, saying that this Word is responsible for the light that shines into darkness. It is interesting that he couples v.4 and 5 together here. One could take v. 5 to mean he is referring to the light that shines in any darkness, for we know that light overcomes darkness in almost any application. But, coupling it with v. 4 he appears to be referring more to the light of God overcoming the darkness found in man saying that the light will have its way in the heart of man. This light will either win in the outcome being either a change of heart in the ‘New Birth’ as explained in the first part of chapter 3 of John or will win resulting in judgment, Jn. 3:18. Here in v. 5 John tells us that light will win and will have its way in either case, but the outcome for the created thing may be different.

No comments:

Post a Comment